waffle

Getting Tired

So let’s say I write a bit about how I’d like to see certain TV shows.

Let’s say I write a little more about how I’d like to see certain TV shows.

Let’s say I write a bit about how the only way they’ll let me see certain TV shows is by downloading them from the Pirate Bay, because they won’t sell them to me.

Let’s say some people take offense and claim that I shouldn’t do that regardless because it’s not conducive to my cause.

Let’s say that I agree and jump through some hoops to get a friend to send me a US iTunes gift card so that I may register a US iTunes account, so that I may still illicitly download and watch stuff, only this time I’m paying someone related to its production, which is fine because it’s also the thing I groveled about not being able to do in the first place. Everything else, I already had.

Let’s say that this works fine, aside from constantly switching between the Swedish and US iTunes or App Stores.

And then, finally, let’s say that in the fucking middle of watching something, this beauty shows up: [iTunes alert: 'This movie cannot be played because a display that is not authorized to play protected movies is connected.']

I didn’t connect an “unauthorized” display; I haven’t even connected an external display to this computer ever. And if I open it up in QuickTime Player, one of a few magical apps that they allow you to play this in, it works fine. I’m getting yelled at by unnecessary technology that was invented to force me to do what I was planning to do anyway, to stop me from doing what they forced me to do because I couldn’t do what they wanted to force me to do, and which I would now like to force them to do since they’re not planning on doing it.

So let’s say DRM works, or accomplishes something positive for any involved part, or is in any way worth the investment of time or money.

Let’s also say unicorns exist, while we’re at it. Maybe they can ride that unicorn to 1 Infinite Loop, and sign a few papers, and at least open up TV shows for distribution in Sweden.

Or even if they wouldn’t, maybe they could actually fix this magic technology to properly restrict me from seeing things I’m allowed to see but only in situations where I’m clearly not allowed to see them, which usually has nothing to do with which acronyms the attached displays support, unless they’d actually make it about that in order to piss people off.

I think I’ve said it before: You did this to yourselves.

Comments

  1. That is the problem, as soon as something like this happens, the user is definitely going to think twice about future purchases. The big companies, Apple especially need to stand up to the media corporations and say, “We distribute without DRM or we don’t distribute”. I think the iTunes store is large enough that this could work. It is like the prisoner’s dilemma though, if Amazon for example do allow DRM into their sales then Apple are screwed. It really requires at least the top 3-5 companies to agree on this. Apple ditched their music DRM after years of customer hate, apart from dealing with movie companies vs music companies, I don’t see why movies should be treated any differently (As well as games, ebooks, news, gps maps, etc.).

    By Chris · 2010.08.15 00:36

  2. It’s easy to blame Apple on this one, and they have not always behaved well, but the video industry is rightfully afraid of what’s happened to the music industry. Just a shame they are punishing the very people who are their salvation (customer who want to pay for shit),

    By JulesLt · 2010.08.15 01:00

  3. JulesLt: Didn’t blame Apple as such. They’re guilty about inventing stupid, ineffectual protection for iPhone, iPad and iPod apps, true. But there’s no incentive for them to dictate or mandate it for music and video, where they have to start with what the rights owners want and drag towards sanity. Most technology companies are like this; Apple isn’t even the shiniest knight.

    I do blame them as the conduit, and there’s no reason to have obviously buggy software.

    Chris: Exactly. Hopefully, DRM will be codified away in one way or another, and people will realize that the sky will not be falling. (They are free to do this today if they’d like: who’s selling DRM-ed music and thriving? For which company has a put-to-rest DRM-based service been good customer service and good PR? Selling a DRM-ed anything is a dissatisfied customer, unless you’re around forever.)

    TV shows and movies have both been stuck on the DRM juice for much longer, though, with VHS fiddling and two/three digital disc formats, and maybe they could make a better case about being a one-shot medium.

    By Jesper · 2010.08.15 03:01

  4. “Let’s say that I agree and jump through some hoops to get a friend to send me a US iTunes gift card so that I may register a US iTunes account, so that I may still illicitly download and watch stuff, only this time I’m paying someone related to its production”

    It says quite clearly in the EULA that stipulating a violation of the EULA is a violation of the EULA.

    This paragraph makes you a criminal.

    By Chucky · 2010.08.15 17:24

  5. Demonstrating perfectly why EULAs per se are still untested. I’d be very surprised if this specific term actually held up in court.

    I’m sure they can’t wait to make me act criminally in the other way. The delta involves slower download speeds, a less warm feeling in the pit of my stomach and them not getting any money.

    By Jesper · 2010.08.15 17:51

  6. Also, quoting Wikipedia:

    While every crime violates the law, not every violation of the law counts as a crime; for example: breaches of contract and of other civil law may rank as “offences” or as “infractions”.

    By Jesper · 2010.08.15 19:23

  7. “Demonstrating perfectly why EULAs per se are still untested. I’d be very surprised if this specific term actually held up in court.”

    Ah, but it says quite clearly in the EULA that questioning the legality of the EULA is a violation of the EULA.

    Thus, this paragraph makes you a super-criminal, and subjects you to extradition to Paraguay, where any complaints you may have about the EULA will be heard and ignored by a military tribunal prior to your sentencing.

    This is all outlined in detail on page 27 of the EULA, and you did click the “I Agree” button, after all…

    By Chucky · 2010.08.15 22:21

  8. :D

    By Jesper · 2010.08.15 22:39

  9. FWIW, I have rather mixed feelings about DRM.

    I have a background in the video entertainment industry, and I think folks who work for a living making art at all levels of that industry are in favor of DRM for quite rational reasons. The existence of digital reproduction has already taken a significant bite out of the industry, and in the total absence of DRM, the industry would be reduced to a shell of its current size.

    That said, DRM is obviously a bit of a clusterfuck right now. I generally won’t buy video from the Apple Store because of the DRM issues, and I love my TiVo precisely because there is no effective DRM on the video I’m paying to receive.

    There is a happy medium somewhere on recorded entertainment, and while we’re obviously nowhere near that happy medium right now, when/if that happy medium ever emerges, it will involve some type of measures to at least discourage mass “sharing”.

    By Chucky · 2010.08.16 12:49

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.