The Importance of Being Mac

I just read two articles, consecutively, that I wanted to comment on. Both are good reads which respective points are not lost on me. But both conflate nomenclature and causes serious confusion as a result.

Tim Bray in Apple App Attrition: “I’m still OK with OS X, but the number of its apps I use is down to Address Book, iTunes, iMovie, and (until the microsecond I find an alternative) iCal.”

Tim, surprisingly, thinks that “OS X” equals the operating system and all its bundled software. The only software mentioned that could be said to be part of Mac OS X as such is Address Book, to which there are hardwired links from within System Preferences, and iCal, which is updated upon Mac OS X revisions. iTunes is indeed bundled with Mac OS X, but it builds heavily on QuickTime. (There’s no iTunes plugin for the web browser, for example.)

John Gruber said it best one and a half year ago: “[F]eeling the need to switch from Safari is a far cry from feeling the need to switch from Mac OS X. Using Firefox doesn’t make you less of a Mac OS X user.”

Perhaps what Tim meant was just the marketing-offered “Mac user”, stereotypically pursuing only Apple’s alternatives for any one task. Among those as technically capable as Tim, not much of them belong to that group.

Paul Thurrott in Zunestory: “The point here is that while it may be impossible for Microsoft to dislodge the Mac faithful from their iPods, that’s a very small group of people anyway.”

Paul, on the other hand, assigns “the Mac faithful” the party line of being the kooks holding up the iPod. Does anyone for a second doubt that there are many Windows users - or even Linux or *BSD users - who did not consider anything else than an iPod when they got it? Paul’s assertion is akin to calling someone who uses Windows “a Zune faithful”. There are a lot of Mac users that are also faithful to the iPod, but those, at least, should be called “the Apple faithful”, if anything. Or hell, I don’t know, how does “the iPod faithful” sound?

(Note: Paul may be referring to the fact that Microsoft does not offer a DRM-toting music store or music software for their (DRM-toting) Zune for Mac OS X. However, it seems unlikely in context.)

Cocoa Weblogs

Apparently, I’m Cocoa Weblogs-worthy. To those just popping in, I’d like to emphasize that I don’t write a lot about Cocoa, but that I’ll shortly introduce a category for Cocoa posts. Meanwhile, these searches for Cocoa and Objective-C on this weblog, or my Cocoa software site may be of assistance.

Competition

Oneupsmanship.

Charity

Word is going around that a bunch of Mac shareware makers are donating their entire income on December 7th to the inimitable Child’s Play charity poised to help hundreds of sick kids at children’s hospitals in a few countries recover. I can step to that.

waffle software, the label under which most of my software is released, does not as of today sell any shareware, but we do however accept donations. In fact, since its inception, 10% of any donation to waffle software at any time has been ear-marked for charity, and I just paid the first $25 of that forward to Child’s Play in mid-November. Let’s step it up a notch: Until December 25, 60% of all donations to waffle software will go to Child’s Play.

In other waffle software news, the new site I’ve been working on (and which was long overdue) is just starting to ease online. In the next week or two, more parts will trickle on, including at least one product upgrade and at least one completely new developer tool.

« Newer posts · Older posts »