+50%

So: What would you do with your tax refund? I know what I would do.

That’s right, I’m going to try out the lauded, uh, easiness to swap hard drives in the MacBook. A Hitachi Travelstar 5K120 120GB HD has just been ordered since the pre-requisite USB to IDE/SATA adapter arrived today.

Here’s the plan:

  1. Swap the drives.
  2. Boot a Mac OS X setup on my iPod.
  3. Format and partition the new drive.
  4. Connect the old drive via the USB adapter.
  5. Copy everything from the old drive to the new drive.

You’ll notice two paths in particular that I don’t plan to go down: I don’t save everything as a disk image or zip file somewhere and I don’t install Mac OS X on the new drive. There are reasons for those.

Saving it as a disk image or zip means that you have to have intermediate space, and saving as a zip in particular means that you’ll have to have double that to uncompress it again (disk images mount in place). Not wanting to install Mac OS X in general is because I don’t want to boot up using the new hard drive. By relying on a third drive, none of the other drives are touched: I can make a bit-by-bit copy with the same permissions, and I don’t need to repartition to gain the new space that I would have by cloning the partition.

“Allow iTunes control from remote speakers”

"Allow iTunes control from remote speakers" iTunes preference near AirTunes options

Interesting.

Music

I’ve talked a lot about iTunes and iPod and whatnot here over the years, but I can hardly recall talking about my musical taste. I think it’s because it’s kind of sprawling.

Generics: I tend to like pretty much anything by Robbie Williams, Monty Python (and, by extension, Eric Idle), Frank Sinatra and Nat King Cole. I tend to not like “rock” or “metal” or dark music of any kind, but I don’t like overly buttery music either (”Diana” in its original arrangement would make me reach for my shotgun, if I had any). I loathe most “love songs” or “ballads”, with very few exceptions. To be diplomatic, I’m very glad my ears only spent a few years in the 80’s. I understand how people get off at mostly electronic music and music with lots of bass, but I don’t.

Compass points: These pinpoint a number of extremes or exceptions in my taste.

  • The Road to Mandalay, Robbie Williams. I submitted this (and only this) to Jon Hicks’ “Endings” list. I don’t tend to like these sorts of songs, but this is an exception.
  • In the Mood, Glenn Miller.
  • My Way, Frank Sinatra. One of, oh, five good things to come out of Paul Anka, ever?
  • Psyche Rock, Pierre Henry. I have no idea who this is, but it was the inspiration for the Futurama theme song (they couldn’t use this because of licensing issues) and it sounds very different.
  • Virtual Insanity, Jamiroquai.
  • One for My Baby (and One More for the Road), Frank Sinatra.
  • Albuquerque, “Weird Al” Yankovic. 11:21 of pure originality.
  • As Time Goes By, Frank Sinatra.
  • I Left My Heart in San Francisco, Dean Martin.
  • Snoopy vs The Red Baron, Johnny Horton.
  • Come Away With Me, Norah Jones.
  • Here We Go Again, Ray Charles.
  • Me and My Monkey, Robbie Williams. Trying to understand why he did what he did.
  • Dry Your Eyes, The Streets. Unique arrangement.
  • Buggy Ride, Wynton Marsalis.
  • Stardust, Nat King Cole. Melodic and poetic: the whole song flows like one long sentence.

What’s your taste in music? If it aligns with mine, do you know of something you think I should listen to?

Day 254

Five years ago today, 19 men orchestrated an attack to hi-jack four commercial flights. Two crashed into two landmark towers in New York City, the World Trade Center, which subsequently collapsed. One crashed into one side of the Pentagon in Virginia, destroying three of five rings. The last crashed in the middle of Pennsylvania thanks to the intervention of its passengers; it was believed to be heading for the White House or the US Capitol in Washington, D.C. Just under 3000 people died as a result of this attack.

This is all statistics. There’s no statistic describing exactly how much the US was affected. There’s no measure for how much those killed or injured are missing out, or how different the world might have looked today had they been alive and with normal vigor.

While other people might tell you to pray or to remember the accident, I won’t. I won’t pray because pray implies putting your life and faith in the hands of someone else. Our lives are already a function of the actions of other people, constantly dependent on history, and constantly shaping the potential for the future, for good and for bad. Some might say that it’s wrong to call what the attackers practiced “religion”, and I’d be inclined to agree, but most major religions today have been guilty of much the same thing in the past albeit on a wider scale. (Sweden was converted to Christianity without having much of a say in the matter, and the status of the woman as a capable human being was downgraded almost immediately. Let’s not forget about the crusades.) I do not honestly believe that organized religion does more good than bad, nor do I believe that if religion was to be dismantled, these assholes wouldn’t invent another concept to hide behind in order to do what they do. The real pricks will always be there, but we can stop instigating them.

I won’t remember the accident because there’s no need. We’re living in the aftermath of it, and the world climate that it has helped set the tone for (but which largely was the same the days before) is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. So if we won’t pray and we won’t remember, what will we do? The textbook answer here is to “continue to live our lives as we normally do”. Anything else means that “the terrorists will already have won”.

The problem is that if we need to be told that, to be told what’s right and what’s wrong, the terrorists have truly already won. Anything I write here is admitting that the attacks have affected us. There’s no point in denying it. A president of one of the world’s most powerful nations brought it to war against two states under varying degrees of correct excuses and is eyeing two, maybe three other states. Pretending to have no idea what you’re talking about but we’re doing everything in our power to kill the bastards doesn’t fly. We can stop belittling ourselves, but that doesn’t just mean “stop acting as if planes will fly into skyscrapers from now on”.

Three years ago today, the Swedish Minister of Foreign Affairs, Anna Lindh, was pronounced dead as a result of being stabbed in the stomach the day before in the middle of a warehouse, days before a referendum asking if Sweden should adopt the Euro. The assassin, Mijailo Mijailović was in jail within 15 months. He was mentally ill, although not mentally ill enough at the time of the murder to be sentenced to psychological care instead of lifetime imprisonment.

There are problems in the world. Without necessarily writing them off as the correct courses of action, it’s clear that they are functions of the current situation, everything that has happened up until then. The situation before September 11th, 2001 prompted the attacks. The situation before September 11th, 2003 prompted the murder. You could analyze these situations, what led up to them and their aftermath for ages. You could stick people in jail or bomb their country and somehow think that now, everything’s fine or that we’ve at least avenged the fuckers. The only thing I think we can all agree on is that not changing is not the answer, or that stopping to reflect on everything is not going to be a substitute for making better choices in the future.

An eye for an eye will only make the world go blind.

« Newer posts · Older posts »